Arguments for the existence of God purporting to show that there must have been a creator ex nihilo, first mover, or ultimate sustainer of physical reality all share a step that the particular sort of infinite regress that there would otherwise be is a metaphysical impossibility. I will here defend one particular kind of "no infinite regress" premise, although I don't think it goes very far in buttressing even the species of cosmological argument that can claim this true premise.
Showing posts with label Kant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kant. Show all posts
Sunday, February 12, 2017
The Infinite Regress Step of Cosmological Arguments
Arguments for the existence of God purporting to show that there must have been a creator ex nihilo, first mover, or ultimate sustainer of physical reality all share a step that the particular sort of infinite regress that there would otherwise be is a metaphysical impossibility. I will here defend one particular kind of "no infinite regress" premise, although I don't think it goes very far in buttressing even the species of cosmological argument that can claim this true premise.
Friday, November 7, 2014
Deceptive Truth: Kant, Sandel, & Bill Clinton
Occasioned
by the suggestion of Sandel that it may sometimes be morally permissible to
deceive people, so long as you do so without lying, I here examine such alleged
truths as “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” After setting up the issues in Section 1, in Sections 2-4 I examine questions of language, communication, and truthfulness
in assessing whether candidate deceptive truths really are true. These
sections require little if any prior familiarity in the area. The fifth
section, however, probably will be hard to follow unless you have some acquaintance
with Kant’s ethics. Lacking that, you still may well be able to follow the
Sections 6-8, and the final section on the Clinton impeachment has no
prerequisites.
Labels:
Ambiguity,
Bronston,
casuistry,
Clinton,
consequentialism,
deceptive truth,
high crimes and misdemeanors,
impeachment,
Kant,
Lewinsky,
lying,
perjury,
Sandel,
term of art,
Textualism,
Vagueness
Thursday, June 19, 2014
A Notice Theory of Just Punishment
Here is a draft of a long simmering paper examining the circumstances in which the offender's knowing that he would be subject to a severe penalty before electing to commit a crime makes just the imposition of that penalty.
Labels:
Alexander,
Goldman,
Justice,
Kant,
Legitimacy,
Nino,
Notice,
Punishment,
Talion
Sunday, June 15, 2014
Is the Moving Now an Illusion if God is Omniscient?
Could
it be that what is, for better or worse, called “the moving now”
is an illusion, or, to put it a little more cautiously, could it be
that at the deepest level description of reality there is no point in
time that has the special status that we think this very moment has?
One
widely held form of theism is committed to the proposition. It is a
usually unnoticed corollary of the combination of two widely held
theological positions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)