Showing posts with label Establishment Clause. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Establishment Clause. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

“In God We Trust” and the Establishment Clause


No one really knows what started the Great Islamic Conversion of Arkansas, but once it got going, it was unstoppable. Not that everyone in Arkansas became a Muslim, of course. There remained some atheists, agnostics, and none-of-the-aboves, especially around centers of higher learning and middle learning. Steadfast Christians remained in greater numbers than the non-believers, although they held a plurality in only three of the less populous counties. Many Christians moved out of state. 

That North Dakota went through its neo-pagan revival starting just two months later, has, of course, multiplied the conspiracy theories – theories involving exotic mixtures of political, religious and extraterrestrial agents with pharmacological, viral-genetic, and hypnotic agencies. As there is precious little hard evidence supporting any of these theories, I will not here descend into that altercation, which is so completely consuming our cable news and internet. 

My interest, instead, is in a relatively minor legal issue arising from the new state mottos of Arkansas and North Dakota. The latter state has adopted: “In Gods We Trust,” while the Arkansans prefer “In Allah We Trust.” Both states display their new mottos prominently on official documents, and in state offices, drivers’ license bureaus and court rooms.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

A Textualist Approach to Legal Interpretation

Here is a draft of a paper on legal interpretation that is similar to origanilism in emphasizing the meaning of the text as enacted, but differs from standard forms of originalism, especially with respect to normative words and phrases in the text and in disavowing as determinative drafter and legislative or ratifier expectation and intent. The first section by itself might be of interest if you are a little uncertain about the difference between ambiguity and vagueness, or types of ambiguity, or what problems of interpretation there are beyond ambiguity and vagueness.