In a new development re my last post, on 7/24/18 Michael
Cohen make public what appears to be a recording of an in-person conference
with Donald Trump, which conference took place shortly before the 2016
election. It seems fair to say that some of the content of this conference
involved things that the client would have wanted to remain secret. If Trump
had already released any part of the attorney-client privileged content of the
conversation, then the privilege was gone. (You cannot pick and choose,
revealing those parts of an attorney-client conference that ore favorable, withholding
the damaging parts.) Cohen could not then be faulted under the attorney-client
privilege branch of his ethical obligation. However, unless Trump had already
caused the release of the entire content of the conversation, privileged or
not, then Cohen was still ethically obliged not to disclose any secrets of the
client that were still secret.
Of course, breaches of his duties under New York’s code of
legal ethics may be pretty low on the list of Cohen’s problems. This release may also be pretty low on the list of ways Cohen will be a problem for Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment