In an old blog post I argued that the Second Amendment created three constitutional rights. “One is a right to participate in the military, in Latin jus militiae, from its origin in Roman law. The second is a right to possess weapons for the purpose of the participation in the militia, [now the National Guard] guaranteed by the first right. The third is a broader right to possess weapons unrelated to matters military.” The Second Amendment: Not One or Two but Three Rights I was mistaken.
Showing posts with label District of Columbia v. Heller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label District of Columbia v. Heller. Show all posts
Saturday, July 8, 2023
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
The Second Amendment: Not One or Two but Three Rights
I will
here argue that the Second Amendment constitutionalizes three rights. One is a right to participate in the
military, in Latin jus militiae, from its origin in Roman law. The second is a right to possess weapons for the purpose of the participation guaranteed by the first right. The third is a broader right to possess weapons unrelated to matters military. I do not argue this interpretation because
I think it conduces to good public policy. What it does is make good
sense both of the operative language of the amendment and
its militia clause.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)