The following propositions seem to me to be probably true: Had Ted Cruz or Josh Hawley been Vice President, Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States. Swing state legislators would have cooperated to that end. Most elected Republicans, whether or not they participated in the coup, would not have objected and very few would have resisted. Most of the Republicans rank and file would have celebrated.
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Monday, July 4, 2022
Monday, September 23, 2019
Socialism Is Democracy Extended.
There has been a centuries-long trend of growth in the share
of the population having a serious say in the way things run. Significant
exceptions are easy to find and there have been terrible reversals, but still
it is a big picture trend. I will call the agents behind reallocation of power
from smaller to larger social groups “the left,” conceding that this is an
oversimplification as well as anachronism, the “left/right” terminology arising
only with the French Estates General.
Friday, June 16, 2017
Mandates, Democratic Theory, and President Trump
It is common for a national leader who wins election by a
large margin to claim a mandate from the voters and a right and duty to make
sweeping policy changes. It is also not uncommon for a candidate who barely
squeaks by in an election to be cautious, proposing a less bold program, and
seeking common ground with other parties. The current US president exhibits the
opposite conduct.
Monday, August 1, 2016
Lottery Democracy
Adding a little randomness to democracy
is sometimes to the good. Why, when, and how far?
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Of Voter Identification, Fraudulent Votes, and Closed-Out Voters
I hope you will all agree that
increasing the stringency of voter identification requirements at the
polls may prevent some unlawful votes, but will also result in some
perfectly lawful votes not being cast, as voters, from various
causes, do not get the right identification in their hands by
election day.
What it seems, naively, should
determine the policy for identification stringency is minimizing the
sum of unlawful votes plus lawful votes that would otherwise have
been cast but were not as result of the stringency. Naive or not,
this is the voter identification policy test for which I will argue.
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Was the US Constitution Unconstitutional?
In the United States we have a nearly universal reverence for our Constitution, the Constitution of 1789 together with its amendments. Largely inspired by the aura of that great document, citizens of the United States tend also to be strong constitutionalists, lower case, believing that every nation should be governed by a written constitution guaranteeing rights, representation, legality, and stability.
It is something of an irony, then, that the Constitution
appears, at least on the face of things, to have been unconstitutional.
Saturday, September 13, 2014
The Moral Underpinnings of Democracy and its Degree-Affected Variant
Motivated by some ideas that percolated around in the New
Left, this essay argues that the core justification of democracy is not that it
maximizes utility (which it often does pretty well) or even that it recognizes equality of citizenship (which is essential to any just political order), but
instead that it is the best projection into the sphere of social decision
making of the values of individual autonomy and liberty. It follows that democracy keyed to the stake
that each voter has in the outcome will sometimes realize democratic values more
fully than does one citizen one vote.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)